« June 2005 | Main | August 2005 »
July 28, 2005
The Kill Shot Update (Part 2)
Major Ed Dames (Remote Viewer) had predicted a long time ago the Space Shuttle would be forced to make an emergency landing at the time of a meteor shower. This would be the nearest preceding event to a large solar flare catastrophe called "The Kill Shot".
On 7/28/2005 Ed Dames stated on his website and I quote "An so it begins..." "www.spaceweather.com".
When looking at spaceweather.com we see there are the following two top reports:
"METEOR SHOWER: Mark your calendar: The Perseid meteor shower peaks on Friday morning, August 12th."
And
"SOMETHING'S COMING: A big active sunspot group is lurking just behind the sun's eastern limb. If the 'spot remains active, we can expect Earth-directed explosions as early as this weekend and continuing next week."
The space shuttle has damage to it, a meteor shower, and now solar sun spots are waiting in the wings. What are the odds that all three events would have been predicted well over a year ago?
Posted by Peter at 12:50 PM | Comments (1)
July 13, 2005
Universal Entanglement Theory (Part 2)
Q and A for the Universal Entanglement Theory.
I would first like to say I believe that all theories are meant to evolve or be broken with the advent of new discoveries. As we learn more as a species we should all expect our view of the universe and how it works to change.
1. How does the human mind/brain interact with these "unique collective vibrational patterns?"
In my model the mind/brain is the Central Processing Unit (CPU) and does not perform all of the thinking/calculations as is believed in mainstream science today. Enormous progress in this field has been accomplished by Dr. Deepak Chopra, as well as many others.
2. Why is the mind of a remote viewer drawn to the target, but gets data at some other time, usually at a time or near a time when a peak emotional event occurs at that target?
The strongest vibrational pattern of the target that the viewer is familiar with by way of memory or unconscious experience, would be the most likely perceivable vibrational pattern by the viewer.
If a person had absolutely no frame of reference to compare the target to based on memory or experience, the target would then either not be perceivable at all, or the vibrational signal from the target would be incorrectly associated with the remote viewers closest memory or unconscious experience. Lack of a frame of reference may also explain why humans (most anyway) are not able to perceive other dimensional planes of existence.
3. Can a person change the outcome of a future event?
I believe based on the latest quantum theories, and experimental research in the field of future event perception and detection, the answer is yes.
When a remote viewer, or other talented individual, perceives a future event. They are being drawn towards the most likely event because of the strength and pattern of the vibrational pattern produced. This is demonstrated in part by Princeton University’s research with the EGG Project. Princeton, as well as others are finding that the future events most easily detectable, are events which triggers a strong human emotion. This easily detectable coherent human vibrational pattern generated by human emotions is unfortunately normally the most coherent from the result of a large negative future event as opposed to a positive event. I guess the old adage that ‘bad news travels fast’ is true.
There are some situations were a remote viewer changed their fate by making a different decision that they would have made, based solely on the future event they perceived. A good example is when Ingo Swann perceived a future event were is life was going to end. As a result of what Ingo perceived he changed his actions to avoid this life ending event.
4. Can a person change the outcome of a past event?
I have heard lectures were the conclusion was an event of the past can’t be changed but can be affected. From my way of thinking though, if you can effect the past in any way then the past event, no matter how large is alterable. The consensus seems to be that we should see a change in the present if the past is changed which I believe is flawed. If the past is changed all present events and even thoughts would jump to the new changed timeline. Since we would seamlessly move to the new timeline along with our history after the event that had changed, no person would be able to perceive the change. Perhaps very large events that have been change without our knowledge, done by unknown individuals or advanced technologies may even have something to do with the déjà vu effect experienced by many.
5. Where is information stored for all past and "probable" future events?
My best postulate on this is that the changing past, present, future, and human thoughts are stored as an ever changing vibrational pattern on the lowest imaginable non-physical substance. This non-physical substance would be bound together by the oneness of the universal entangled non-matter vibration. Tom Bearden has done some great work on this. Like most I don’t agree with what all other researchers in this cutting edge field propose, but anything that drives us to think outside our comfortable reality boxes, and reach beyond the known into the unknown, is very beneficial indeed. This is why I keep an open mind to any possibility.
6. How does the level of human conscientiousness come into your model?
Human consciousness in my model is information that is transmitted from the total self to the lowest biological receiver that is still able to be perceived by and understood by the higher biological self.
Total Self as I define as the collective unconscious, made up of all minds and all thoughts. This can be accomplished by the Universal Entanglement Theory.
Lowest Biological Receiver as I define as the structure of the double helix DNA strands as being very complex antennas.
Higher Biological Self as I define as the whole of the brain as a center processing unit (CPU) working in conjunction with the rest of the body to process information.
In closing:
I’m not sure if you are familiar with the work of William A. Tiller, but he is doing great ground breaking work in the field of psychoenergetics. For example similar vibrational patterns will become more entwined with each other without regards to distance, in part I believe because of this universal entanglement. I’ve also seen this effect verified by many Russian and Chinese researchers over the past 30 years.
Posted by Peter at 12:14 PM | Comments (1)
July 11, 2005
Conspiracies of Terror Attacks
I found the below news article, which was one of many that talked about the London attacks. Although I don't completely know, and or believe, all of what they have to say how things are. I do believe it is good to stay open minded to the possibility that things are a lot more complex than they appear.
http://www.thesimon.com/magazine/articles/canon_fodder/0889_what_behind_london_attacks.html
See the below for the Israel news report.
http://israelnn.com/news.php3?id=85346
Also the unusual selling of the British Pound vs. to Dollar a full five hours ahead of the attack, specifically at 22:45 hours EST on July 6th 2005.
A BBC Radio 5 interview that aired on the evening of the 7th tells the tale of London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Taking Place at Same Time as Real Attack. See the below link for details.
I believe the officials know much more than what we are being told!
Posted by Peter at 12:32 PM | Comments (1)