January 25, 2006
Double Slit Experiment - Down The Rabbit Hole
Click on the below link,
http://www.whatthebleep.com/trailer/
then click on the first trailer called "Double Slit Experiment from Down The Rabbit Hole".
Absolutely Awesome!!!
Posted by Peter at 12:12 PM | Comments (0)
December 13, 2005
Planetary Hyperdimensional Entrainment Physics Theory
Is the principles of Entrainment and Hyperdimensional Physics the cause for all of our planets seemingly to be increasing in temperature?
Are our actions, such as nuclear bomb testing, altering Earth’s vibrational pattern and in turn causing the rest of our planets to alter synchronization to match that of Earth?
Read on for evidence for my theory.
If you have many pendulum clocks on the same wall they will eventually all become in sync with each other (they will all tick at the exact same time). Click here for more details.
Princeton University has electronic boxes setup all over the world to continuously produce random numbers. At any give time these device are completely random and not in sync with each other. There have been times, for instance just prior to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack, the devices became synchronized with each other. For real-time java feedback from these devices, as well as additional information, go to this link. This would suggest that having a large number of people thinking similar thoughts will directly effect the environment.
The work of physicists William A. Tiller PhD and Walter E. Dibble PhD at Stanford University into the understanding of the newly emerging field of subtle energy, have been producing very profound results. Subtle energy refers to the medium through which consciousness acts on the realm of matter and energy. They were able to prove that thought has a direct impact on their lab environment, and the labs electronic equipment which was very measurable. Their results were also duplicated be many other scientists in this country as well as others.
I believe that the above is at least good preliminary evidence to backup my Planetary Hyperdimensional Entrainment Physics theory.
I am open to comments and feedback.
Posted by Peter at 05:33 PM | Comments (0)
October 10, 2005
Will robots replace all future jobs? (Part 2)
DARPA's Successful Autonomous Robotic Race.
Five of the robotic controlled vehicles finished the DARPA Grand Challenge race, where as last year (2004) non finished. I don't think that it will be long before the military starts putting these autonomous vehicles into the war zone. I know that DARPA has plans to have these types of autonomous vehicles drive robotic warriors to battle in the near future, less then 20 years. I would say that within possibly 20 years, depending more on politics than technology, trucks will begin to be fully autonomous driving themselves across the country to deliver merchandise.
For more information see the below links:
Yahoo News on the DARPA Grand Challenge
DARPA Grand Challenge Home Page
Posted by Peter at 12:54 PM | Comments (0)
September 26, 2005
Proof of Weather Modification?
Some very unusual, if not impossible, radar image loops were detected by the nation weather service which might very well suggest that hurricane Katrina was controlled and sent strait to the New Orleans area. Was this to avoid the hurricane Katrina from destroying a more valuable target (The oil refineries of Texas), or did the aggressors fail in a high priority target as a result of U.S. defenders?
For the full story read the below:
www.EnterpriseMission.com
Also check out:
www.WeatherWars.info
Posted by Peter at 12:42 PM | Comments (0)
August 19, 2005
Plum Island Lab 257
Disturbing information on the Government's Secret Plum Island Biological Laboratory.
The facility has ventilation system that has holes in it, do to lack of maintainance, which has is allowing containments out into the surrounding environment.
Lyme disease, as well as many other diseases, have first appeared in the United States in close proximity to this island.
This island only has a four to five guards protecting it on a 9:00am to 5:00pm basis. This should come to no surprise that miscellaneous items go missing there all the time.
Terrorist who have been captured have also admitted that they have had their eye on the facility for some time.
For more detailed information on the Plum Island Lab 257 check out the below sites:
Michael Christopher Carroll author of the "Lab 257" book:
http://www.cbrinstitute.org/carroll/mcc.html
http://www.carlzimmer.com/articles/2004/articles_2004_Lab257.html
Plum Island:
http://www.ars.usda.gov/plum/
http://www.gene-watch.org/genewatch/articles/14-3plumisland.html
Quote about the book Lab 257:
'If you lost sleep after reading THE HOT ZONE, then Michael Christopher Carroll's LAB 257 will keep you awake all night. One of the best pieces of investigative reporting you'll read this year. LAB 257 is must-reading for the post-9/11 world.'
-Nelson DeMille
Posted by Peter at 04:56 PM | Comments (1)
July 13, 2005
Universal Entanglement Theory (Part 2)
Q and A for the Universal Entanglement Theory.
I would first like to say I believe that all theories are meant to evolve or be broken with the advent of new discoveries. As we learn more as a species we should all expect our view of the universe and how it works to change.
1. How does the human mind/brain interact with these "unique collective vibrational patterns?"
In my model the mind/brain is the Central Processing Unit (CPU) and does not perform all of the thinking/calculations as is believed in mainstream science today. Enormous progress in this field has been accomplished by Dr. Deepak Chopra, as well as many others.
2. Why is the mind of a remote viewer drawn to the target, but gets data at some other time, usually at a time or near a time when a peak emotional event occurs at that target?
The strongest vibrational pattern of the target that the viewer is familiar with by way of memory or unconscious experience, would be the most likely perceivable vibrational pattern by the viewer.
If a person had absolutely no frame of reference to compare the target to based on memory or experience, the target would then either not be perceivable at all, or the vibrational signal from the target would be incorrectly associated with the remote viewers closest memory or unconscious experience. Lack of a frame of reference may also explain why humans (most anyway) are not able to perceive other dimensional planes of existence.
3. Can a person change the outcome of a future event?
I believe based on the latest quantum theories, and experimental research in the field of future event perception and detection, the answer is yes.
When a remote viewer, or other talented individual, perceives a future event. They are being drawn towards the most likely event because of the strength and pattern of the vibrational pattern produced. This is demonstrated in part by Princeton University’s research with the EGG Project. Princeton, as well as others are finding that the future events most easily detectable, are events which triggers a strong human emotion. This easily detectable coherent human vibrational pattern generated by human emotions is unfortunately normally the most coherent from the result of a large negative future event as opposed to a positive event. I guess the old adage that ‘bad news travels fast’ is true.
There are some situations were a remote viewer changed their fate by making a different decision that they would have made, based solely on the future event they perceived. A good example is when Ingo Swann perceived a future event were is life was going to end. As a result of what Ingo perceived he changed his actions to avoid this life ending event.
4. Can a person change the outcome of a past event?
I have heard lectures were the conclusion was an event of the past can’t be changed but can be affected. From my way of thinking though, if you can effect the past in any way then the past event, no matter how large is alterable. The consensus seems to be that we should see a change in the present if the past is changed which I believe is flawed. If the past is changed all present events and even thoughts would jump to the new changed timeline. Since we would seamlessly move to the new timeline along with our history after the event that had changed, no person would be able to perceive the change. Perhaps very large events that have been change without our knowledge, done by unknown individuals or advanced technologies may even have something to do with the déjà vu effect experienced by many.
5. Where is information stored for all past and "probable" future events?
My best postulate on this is that the changing past, present, future, and human thoughts are stored as an ever changing vibrational pattern on the lowest imaginable non-physical substance. This non-physical substance would be bound together by the oneness of the universal entangled non-matter vibration. Tom Bearden has done some great work on this. Like most I don’t agree with what all other researchers in this cutting edge field propose, but anything that drives us to think outside our comfortable reality boxes, and reach beyond the known into the unknown, is very beneficial indeed. This is why I keep an open mind to any possibility.
6. How does the level of human conscientiousness come into your model?
Human consciousness in my model is information that is transmitted from the total self to the lowest biological receiver that is still able to be perceived by and understood by the higher biological self.
Total Self as I define as the collective unconscious, made up of all minds and all thoughts. This can be accomplished by the Universal Entanglement Theory.
Lowest Biological Receiver as I define as the structure of the double helix DNA strands as being very complex antennas.
Higher Biological Self as I define as the whole of the brain as a center processing unit (CPU) working in conjunction with the rest of the body to process information.
In closing:
I’m not sure if you are familiar with the work of William A. Tiller, but he is doing great ground breaking work in the field of psychoenergetics. For example similar vibrational patterns will become more entwined with each other without regards to distance, in part I believe because of this universal entanglement. I’ve also seen this effect verified by many Russian and Chinese researchers over the past 30 years.
Posted by Peter at 12:14 PM | Comments (1)
June 30, 2005
Universal Entanglement Theory
There are two parts to my universal entanglement theory, which I have kept very simple.
Part One:
A single vibrational pattern that all sub-atomic particles and non-particles have in common. This is the result of the big bang, Creator of All, or singularity that started the universe/multiverse in the very beginning of all that is.
Part Two:
A collective vibrational pattern that is unique in all sub-atomic particles and non-particles, which this unique collective vibrational pattern is not found anywhere else in the multiverse.
Example:
An example of this theory is when a Controlled Remote Viewer (CRVer) makes contact with a target, in order to gain information about it; the information has no lag time between the target and the CRVer. There appears to be no lag time between the two because of the common single vibrational pattern (entanglement) that is shared between the two as there is with all things.
As the CRVer connects more and more to the target, the CRVer can perceive more information as a result of his/her pattern becoming more in sync/entwined with the targets pattern. Attention must be paid for the CRVer to not become to in sync/entangled with the target, as this will make the CRVer’s vibrational pattern produce the same attributes that the target’s vibrational pattern produces. This may have positive or negative results depending on the target.
In light of the above, I would come to the conclusion that knowledge or ability (like psychokinesis) may be able to be acquired much faster than normal if one person connects with the pattern of another person that has a very advanced ability that they wish to acquire.
Universal Entanglement Theory - by Peter D. Arvo
Posted by Peter at 12:20 PM | Comments (1)
June 06, 2005
Real Robotic Mech Prototype
This is a good example of real life imitating movies and games.
This robot, made by Sakakibara Kikai, would fit in nicely into Microsoft’s popular MechAssualt game for the XBox. The Mech having two legs, two guns, and one human occupant is quite menacing looking.
This is a good example of the direction technology is moving in for crowd control, and for the war department, future of weapon systems. Picture this Mech with artificial intelligence, no human on board, and capable for running at a speed of 20 to 30 mph. Think that it unrealistic, think again? Plans for such devices are already being worked out in many countries around the world.
The future looks cool, but also scary at times...
Posted by Peter at 07:56 AM | Comments (1)
April 21, 2005
Non-Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)s
For a list of non-GMO food see the below links.
You can also ask your local supermarket manager about what foods are GMO free.
Also check out the recent problem GMOs in China.
Posted by Peter at 04:50 PM | Comments (1)
March 22, 2005
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)s
After viewing a video that was sent to me in the mail on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)s, and GMOs being portrayed in the video as not just bad but in some cases deadly, I decided to do my own research into this.
I started by looking into one of the largest GMO manufactures in the world, Monsanto Corporation.
• Monsanto Corp has a very bad record of bullying countries, people, and bending the truth to their favor. See the below news reports for more details:
• Monsanto bribing an Indonesian government official:
• Monsanto sues uncooperative farmer:
• PCBs released into the environment by Monsanto:
• Monsanto and Fox TV Unite to Suppress Journalists' Free Speech:
• Probe into bullying of Genetically Modified panel scientists:
• Ashcroft and his donors - Did Monsanto buy itself an attorney general?:
• Information about the Monsanto vs Schmeiser case (though might be somewhat slanted since it is Scheiser's website), can be found at the below site:
http://www.percyschmeiser.com/
The above is just the tip of the iceberg of the tactics used.
Every time humans decide to change Mother Nature to make a profit, no long term good has ever come from it. I might feel differently about this topic if greed was not the main driving factor, and if a real long term unbiased study was done to address the safety concerns, but that is not the case.
What I think is most shocking to me is that the gene that is intentionally targeted and changed in these GMOs, is not the only gene that gets changed. Do to the process used in changing these GMOs, other unintended genes also get changed at random. The process used can result in spontaneous mutations in the gene sequence after the new GMO has been released into the environment. This fact alone should raise important heath and safety concerns to warrant a long term study by people who have nothing to gain by the out come of the research.
If you would like to help get a law passed called "Genetically Engineered Food Right to Know Act", which will require labels for foods containing GMOs, please visit the below site. The below site also contains a list of organic food distributors.
http://www.thecampaign.org
Posted by Peter at 12:46 PM | Comments (2)
March 02, 2005
Weatherman talks Control of the Weather Today!
A weatherman named Scott Stevens has come to the conclusion that certain groups on this planet have near total control over the weather. He is not alone in this belief. Certain members in the physics community (Tom Bearden) believe this is possible using scalar wave technologies, and weather warfare is now talked about amongst DOD agencies around the world.
Although I still would like to see more evidence for myself, before deciding to what extent the weather of the world is being manipulated. I do believe it is being manipulated to some extent. I have come to this conclusion, after my own research into the varies HAARP projects scattered through out the world, as well as other websites like the one created below by Scott.
For Scott Stevens website click here.
Scott was also a guest on Coast to Coast AM. If you don't already have a subscription to this site, I highly recommend that you purchase one (and no I am not ever paid for endorsements).
Posted by Peter at 12:12 PM | Comments (0)
March 01, 2005
Possible signs of biological activity on Mars
BBC news reports reports that Vittorio Formisano says that methane and formaldehyde could be signs biological activity, although only a thorough soil analysis can prove it
The methane on Mars is especially interesting, because the gas is quickly broken down by sunlight. Therefore, for methane to be detected in the Martian atmosphere, it must be being constantly replenished in some way. The most likely way would be through emissions from living microbes.
For the full story click here.
At some point, as more countries send space probes to Mars, NASA or those who filter the video/images before NASA gets them, will need to come clean on what has been found.
Posted by Peter at 04:45 PM | Comments (0)
February 28, 2005
Will robots replace all future jobs?
Will robots replace all human workers in the future, even programmers? This writer thinks so. Read on to understand why.
Mc Donald’s and various others are changing over to near total automation. See below website for just a few of the details to Mc Donald’s master plan.
http://marshallbrain.com/robotic-nation.htm
WalMart and Meijers just to name a few have done away with all their baggers and also have several self checkout lanes. What’s next? I have seen a system where a whole shopping cart can be scanned. The self check out will switch, from a customer scanning one item at a time, to scanning the entire contents of their shopping cart at once. They (meaning WalMart) have had their eye on this technology for some time. So what is the hold up you ask? The chips are not yet in all the products that WalMart sells, minus Gillette and a few others that already have the smart chips embedded into the products. Once all of the manufactures imbed this tiny chip, you will be able to push your whole shopping cart over/through a special scanner, and all your merchandise will be scanned at one time. Combine this with a device like the Mobile Speedpass some gas stations have, and you have one automated system. Within the next couple years I predict the extinction of all baggers, and all cashiers (no later than 2010). Of course out of the twenty some odd lanes at some stores, they my keep one cashier/manager to oversee all the lanes. The question then also becomes. What would happen if the power goes out? Even if you have cash you will not be able to buy anything, when you have one cashier/manager to support twenty or more lanes. This is a recipe for a massive breakdown of vital services, do to unpredictable weather or any other cause.
Image of robot who is operating a backhoe:
http://www.aist.go.jp
Updated Humanoid Robotics Info Page:
Android World
The below is a link to a very advanced prototype humanoid robot called Valerie. This robot is available now (for the right price). At the time that I am writing this it would cost around $90,000 (so says my source).
www.androidworld.com
Sony's humanoid robot QRIO is getting access to a Tera-Flop Computer Cluster. Sony is supposedly working on a project to connect the QRIO via high-speed network to a 250 Computer Cluster. The company aims to enable QRIO to make its own decisions. There are no details in the news published in Nihon Keizai Shimbun Sunday edition on the features and approach of the Software running on the Computer Grid. Story on Nikkei Net (subscription).
With the newest in humanoid robots being able to be programmed via voice command. No programmers will be needed (2050), except for analysis of the most advanced artificial intelligence code and then updating this code. This will be a very small programming market in deed, where only the best of the best need apply.
So what will happen to the rest of us in 2050? We will probably be under the utter rule, and living in poverty, by those who own the robotics companies.
Eventually a day will come when the robots’ intelligence is so great; I would guess by 2095, that they might decide they no longer want to work for us. This might turn into a very grim outcome, and with no one left alive who knows how to live off the land (or do much of anything other than be engaged with our entertainment) the old way. Everyone will have no choice but to do as their new computerized masters’ say.
Posted by Peter at 12:19 PM | Comments (0)
February 18, 2005
NASA - Life on Mars Report
WASHINGTON -- A pair of NASA scientists told a group of space officials at a private meeting here Sunday that they have found strong evidence that life may exist today on Mars, hidden away in caves and sustained by pockets of water.
The scientists, Carol Stoker and Larry Lemke of NASA’s Ames Research Center in Silicon Valley, told the group that they have submitted their findings to the journal Nature for publication in May, and their paper currently is being peer reviewed.
For the full story by Brian Berger click on the below link.
Posted by Peter at 12:37 PM | Comments (0)
January 19, 2005
NASA email from Curt Niebur
From : Curt Niebur
Sent : Wednesday, January 19, 2005
To : Peter Arvo
Subject : Fwd: Mars Opportunity images - Question
Mr. Arvo,
Your message below was forwarded to me for response.
The anomaly you spotted appears to be a speck of dust that was temporarily located on or just in front of the left Navcam. It is not present in the right Navcam frame collected at about the same time, and is not present in images taken by either the left or right Navcam a couple of minutes before and after. Mars is a pretty dusty and windy place. I would imagine that the wind blew a speck of dust onto the lens and then subsequently blew it off. We see the same thing happening to the solar array: it gets dusty and produces less power, but a dust devil sweeps by every now and then and blows the dust off, allowing the rover to get more power.
Thank you for your interest in the mission!
Curt Niebur
---------------
When or if I get his response I will append his response here, and will add updated to the title of this message...
Posted by Peter at 12:19 PM | Comments (2)
2nd Anomalous Image Found!
We have not been able to find out who found this second anomaly at this time.
http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/094/2N134687551ESF2700P1962L0M1.HTML
This anomaly is located in the upper left of the image.
Posted by Peter at 12:07 PM | Comments (0)
January 12, 2005
NASA/JPL Communication
NASA/JPL Communication - Day 1
First Phone Call:
I left a voicemail message for Guy Webster at NASA’s JPL (Jet Propulsion Laboratory), and he promptly called me back about half an hour later.
I asked him if he knew where I might obtain information on the equipment used, for the navigation cameras, on the rover opportunity. He told me that if I send him an email that he would forward me a PDF file with the information that I wanted. He also told me that if this did not answer my questions, that he could forward what I was looking for to one of the engineers who had worked on assembling the camera system. This concluded our conversation.
Second Phone Call:
I left a message for and was promptly called back by Henry Kline of NASA’s JPL (Jet Propulsion Laboratory).
Henry was kind enough to chat with me for several minutes about trying to obtain a higher resolution image that has the anomaly on it. He asked me if I had tried to zoom in on the anomaly yet, and before I could answer he said that he would try since he had Adobe Photoshop on his computer (it did not occur to me until after I hung up the phone why Henry dealing with the raw images from the rovers would need sophisticated photo editing software). He said after zooming in on it with Photoshop that it was still blurry when zoomed in. He told me that he did not think that it was what we had all hoped it was, and that he thought that it may just be some dirt on the lens.
I also asked Henry if he knew who Jim Erickson was and if the press statement he made was true about “someone or something cleaning off the rover at night”. He said he did know who Jim Erickson was, but had not heard about that news article, and that I could contact Guy Webster about it. I told Henry that I had just got off the phone with Guy Webster and I would email him about it.
The phone conversation ended with Henry stating that if I came up with any other information on this topic that he would like to know about it.
Henry
I must say that the people at JPL were much more helpful than I thought that they would have been, and spent a good amount of time talking with me during their working hours (I phoned them after 6pm my time, so it was 3:00pm California time).
NASA/JPL Communication - Day 2
Email response from Guy Webster is as follows:
From : Guy Webster
Sent : Tuesday, January 11, 2005
To : Peter Arvo
Subject : Re: Mars Rover Camera PDF
Peter,
Here is that article about the navigation cameras and other engineering cameras. It ran in the Dec. 2003 issue of the Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets).
I did not hear or tape Jim Erickson's interview by the reporter for the New Scientist. The quote sounds like something he might have said, but the Reuters article may give an impression of more "mystery" than he or other engineers on the project would consider appropriate. The uncertainty is which of two good possibilities -- ether wind blowing off some dust or frost causing dust to clump up -- let the solar panels start getting more sunshine. There's a little more info about that in an October press release at http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2004-261 .
-- Guy
Posted by Peter at 12:23 PM | Comments (0)
January 11, 2005
Image Professionals Respond to Mars Rover(Part2)
Jeffery Sainio - Staff Photoanalyst for MUFON responds:
I sent an email to Jeffery Sainio who is the Staff Photoanalyst for MUFON. The following are his responses and my question. I would also like to thank Jeffery for spending the time in analyzing this NASA image. It is much appreciated!
From : Jeffrey Sainio
Sent : Monday, January 10, 2005
To : Peter Arvo
Subject : Re: Mars Rover Image
Gee,whatever it is, it's guaranteed extraterrestrial... and not a bird, insect, or airplane.
The anomalous streak is not verified by the right camera of the stereo pair, which suggests a check of equipment malfunction is in order. The darkest point of the streak has a greyscale value of 8, while an adjacent pixel is 222, typical sky brightness. I could find no other such contrast (i.e. near-black adjacent to near-white) anywhere in the photo. Such failure to discover such contrast is hardly unexpected,
since focus is never perfect. Borders between known dark and light edges, such as the horizon, or nearby bright rocks, are spread out over 3 or 4 pixels. This extraordinary contrast indicates the image was not created by light passing through the lens, since the lens is incapable of creating such an image. Some other cause is probable. I'm no expert on the electronics of these imagers, and detailed knowledge is needed to know all their oddities. As an example of other defects, note the unfocused test image in the link below, and also the half-dozen specks which cannot be 'real' objects: >
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/318/1P156413415EDN3940P2697L7M1.HTML
From : Peter Arvo
Sent : Monday, January 10, 2005
To : Jeffrey Sainio
Subject : Re: Mars Rover Image
Jeffery,
Thank you very much for your input it is greatly appreciated.
I did talk with several individuals at NASA and JPL and they tell me that their guess is dirt on the lens. They are going to email me a white paper with the technical specifics of the navigation rover cameras, so that I can look into this further.
It's my understanding that you believe that it is most likely a data error while taking the photo, or that the error occurred in transmission. Correct?
Also, is it ok if I publish your comments to the Internet?
Thank you again for your time.
Peter Arvo
From : Jeffrey Sainio
Sent : Tuesday, January 11, 2005
To : Peter Arvo
Subject : Re: Mars Rover Image
Obviously, they know more about their lenses than I do, but...
This explanation begs the question of where the dirt went for the next photo. I suppose it COULD have been blown off by the same wind that put it there. The 'dust' would have to be fibrous, not a pointlike object such as a tiny sand grain. Of course, Opportunity just
visited its busted-up heatshield which may have released such fibers.
Typically, the surface of the lens package is extremely OUT of focus. I'd challenge anybody to focus their camera at a distant object, stick their thumb on the lens, and see a focused thumbprint. In this situation, the anomalous image is extremely IN focus. The theory contradicts the data. There are other locations within a complex lens system which are also focus planes. These locations are typically internal, sealed and inaccessible to dust. I can't be certain
without lens data. I don't believe another focal-plane can exist without an intervening lens, but those guys at NASA might know something I don't.
My best guess is a data error, possibly caused by a physical event such as a cosmic-ray hit(atmosphere isn't very helpful in blocking them) on the imaging CCD or whatnot; most data errors at locations other than the CCD would cause vertical or horizontal defects.
Regarding transmission errors, again I'm no expert on their transmission protocol, but typically there is error checking & correction of each stage of data transfer. A corrupted transmission
would be tossed out, possibly causing the black squares frequently seen in these images.
You are welcome to use my comments elsewhere. I'd appreciate if you'd point out that I'm the Staff Photoanalyst for MUFON, and that my expertise is primarily terrestrial. These rovers are a far cry from the home-electronics systems that I've become familiar with, and there are certainly better experts (somewhere) than I. BUT if you're told this is dirt on the lens, with no explanation of why such dirt would be in perfect focus, you haven't found an expert.
______
Posted by Peter at 12:54 PM | Comments (1)
Image Professionals Respond to Mars Rover(Part1)
Mark Carlotto responds:
JPEG compresses 8 x 8 pixel blocks of the image. You can see this if you zoom up on and enhance low contrast portions of the image. The object looks like it is a little bigger than 8 pixels, and so it occurs in two adjacent compression blocks. Although it is possible for noise to corrupt one block it is unlikely that it would affect two adjacent blocks. So I'd say that it's probably not a compression artifact.
Posted by Peter at 12:47 PM | Comments (0)
January 07, 2005
Anomaly in Mars Rover Image (Update NASA Link)
The below is the direct link to the anomalous image on NASA's site.
This leads more evidence that this may in fact be a UFO.
Stay tuned.
Posted by Peter at 05:31 PM | Comments (1)
Anomaly in Mars Rover Image (Update)
The below is the response that I received, about the anomaly, from Whitley Strieber:
"Sent : Friday, January 7, 2005 12:45 PM
Subject : Re: Mars Rover Opportunity - Anomalous Image
This is most interesting. Because it is airborne, it
cannot be claimed that it's rover debris. Because of
the way the light falls on it, consistent with the
position of the sun, it is unlikely to be an
instrument artifact.
Thanks for this.
Whitley Strieber"
I also received the following response from Mark Olson:
"I asked a friend of mine who has been doing videography for 20 years now what he thought of it and he said it is not a video artifact as that would show up in the frames before and after, so it's not something on the lens. You just might have something my friend.
Mark"
Stay tuned as I make my inquiry to NASA.
I'm not sure if they will respond or not, but it is always worth a try...
Posted by Peter at 05:11 PM | Comments (0)
January 05, 2005
Anomaly in Mars Rover Image
While looking into one crash image sent to me by a contact of mine I ran across an anomalous object which can be viewed by clicking the included link below.
The anomaly is located in the upper right portion of the sky. This may turn out to only be something on the camera lens, but it does not appear that this object is one the lens. I have tried to zoom in on it as much as possible and have not found any tampering. Someone will need to look into this further to be able to tell for certain.
Posted by Peter at 04:55 PM | Comments (0)