« April 2005 | Main | September 2005 »
August 18, 2005
The Optimum Approach To War Fear and Terror
The Optimum Approach
I think the best approach is to eliminate the fear in the mind of your enemy because it is that fear that creates them as your enemy. On the same hand it is the fear in our mind leads us to see them as an enemy. Therefore we must eliminate the fear in our minds.
We must dispel all fear, any ideas on how to do that? What things counter fear? Compassion, love, Intelligence, awareness and most of all open communication, and last of all seeing all others as your self or as part of the same body.
I would suggest taking the very toughest route if everyone has the guts for it, which eliminates the cause.
Eliminate the labels that divide and separate from our communications.
Eliminate the fear in your mind and in the minds of your enemy with open communication.
Organize the people and implement the means to take collective control of the governments which eliminates individuals as weak links. Create full transparency with citizen oversight committees.
Embrace and transform = Paradise
Reject and Exclude = Doom
As for the unscrupulous and irrational men that are beyond reason, sequester them in contemplation centers till they evolve as a result of corrective enlightenment.
Eliminate the fictions in the minds of the people, but first you must eliminate them in your own mind.
We don’t need cameras on every street corner we need them in the boardrooms and government meeting places. This is where the crimes are committed that spawn the conditions that create all the other petty crime. The criminal in the street is in general just a symptom of imbalance.
A friend of mine who speaks with someone that has worked with Donald Rumsfeld and is an defense intelligence industry analyst, stated that Rumsfield is the impetus behind the whole thing not necessarily Bush. He is not liked by many, however he knows what he wants to achieve in his mind and sticks to it. He does what he thinks is right. We cannot find fault in that.
It is said that Rumsfeld's choice of thinking is to annihilate any future threat before it becomes one, it is that simple and straightforward. So if Iran or Syria could become a threat then one could say based on his policy and track record they will be taken over.
Now are they a real threat or does the fear and threat just exists in the minds of some men? Who knows? Is it all just a big game some? For sure it is a nightmare for many.
Then the big question can you justify force to eliminate a future threat? A future threat does not actually exist, only the present exists. If not what does it justify?
Had we done this early with Germany in WWII how would this have changed history, how many lives would it have saved?
It would seem the real crime of going into Iraq would be that there was no real threat. It was made up, in the minds of some men. It appears that evidence supports the idea that there was no real threat unless there was something they didn't tell us, which is why there should be no secrets. Did we go to war simply on speculation? Did we do it to stop Saddam from selling Oil in Euro's instead of dollars? Is this acceptable I think not. Then what does it justify?
Was there another approach to eliminating this possible future threat?
Yes and that is why we need to support the DOP legislation being voted on in September. We need a secretary of Peace.
Gravity is better than force to be used as the impetus for change. Better that they gravitate to the solution rather than being pushed.
I think the best approach is to eliminate the fear in the mind of one's enemy because it is that fear that creates them as your enemy. On the same hand it is the fear in our mind leads us to see them as enemy.
We must dispel all fear, any ideas on how to do that? What things counter fear?
What operation or policy can succeed if it is allowed to co-exist with greed and corruption.
The high probability is that the truth will come out. But what if it is not about truth, what if it is about the control and manipulation of perception?
What if the real battle is the control of public perception?
This can only be won or corrected by the creation of an independent media.
We now have the infrastructure to create an independent media and make it manifest.
That should be one of our top goals. Each individual can support the operation by subscribing to it.
But this is the past and we should not dwell on it but take the wisdom that it provided and apply it to the present which is where the future will manifest. Dwelling on the past and worrying about the future steals from the present. So lets not spend to much time arguing whether it was right or wrong but move to an approach that eliminates conflict and remove from their positions by proper channels any that cannot support this idea in their consciousness. Or perhaps a Secretary of Peace to balance the perspectives of these good men whose judgment could be clouded by their past.
Let the mothers no longer weep and let the children still have their fathers when they go to sleep.
Amen
Posted by Richard at 2:01 PM | Comments (0)
The War on Terror - A SHAM - stomping on shadows
The War on Terror (NOT) - stomping on shadows to make them go away
The phrase “war on terror” is an empty statement that actually creates what it portends to be against. As such it will not lead to a solution; it does not represent an executable plan that would achieve anything of value. It perpetuates Illusion and results in misperception. It is also an irrational statement, propaganda designed to manipulate and actually instill the fear it that is pretends to be against. This phrase is the device of a terrorist, and in it’s use we do their bidding.
Terror has no mind and no will it has no body it does not act and cannot be acted upon. Therefore one cannot have a war on terror. “War on Terror” is a sham statement. Terror meaning intense fear cannot be destroyed because it exists in the mind of individuals and is intangible. Only the source of the fear which is born of ignorance supported by events, spoken intentions and pending consequences resulting from the actions of some, can be eliminated. That which gives rise to the fear needs to be addressed and more specifically the illusions, and ignorance that gives rise to it. Be it scarcity, oppression, control, and loss of freedom. It is the fear in the minds of the so called terrorists that needs to be addressed. It is the anger born of pain and suffering that leads to violence. The terrorists do not need to be destroyed; it is the perceptions in their mind that result in their actions that need to be addressed. If these perceptions and fears are not eliminated new bodies will come to host them. There will be no end to terrorism. It is conflict that results in destructive actions. We need conflict resolution.
Since it is the fear, anger or pain in the minds of the terrorists that is the enemy and it cannot be touched or seen then one cannot go to war against it.
It is the fear in the minds of those who appear to be the enemy that is our target. It is the dissolution of this fear that shall be the object of our intention.
Let truth and compassion be the way and let gravity and not force be the impetus for change. This is not to say we should not apprehend those that are a physical threat, but if we do nothing to eliminate the source of their creation there will be an endless supply.
It is the fear in our minds that is made manifest in the minds of those who might become our enemy.
The proper name for this project should be along the lines of the “Conflict Resolution Movement” or “Peace Propagation Effort” or Perhaps “The Peace Establishment” or “Researching a common understanding” or The Empathetic Revolution. Not the “War on Terror”.
There is nothing to war against; it is all about communication, understanding and eliminating the illusions that result in false thinking, leading to negative emotions and erroneous and destructive actions.
SHAM
1. Something false or empty that is purported to be genuine; a spurious imitation.
2. The quality of deceitfulness; empty pretense.
3. One who assumes a false character; an impostor
If one were wishing to engage the light of the sun so their skin would produce vitamin D, that they may avoid lethal cancers later in life, they would dismay if by the movement of the sun they found themselves in the shadow of the tree. Would it make sense to stomp on the shadow and curse the tree? Was it not that the sun itself that moved. So why is it that we do this? Why not simply move into the light and bless the tree? If we were in the heat of the desert would we curse the sun and tell it to flee or would we find the shade of a fig tree?
Do not embrace their Illusions cast them into the pit with the words from your discerning mind.
Let the mothers no longer weep and let the children still have their fathers when they go to sleep.
Amen
Posted by Richard at 1:51 PM | Comments (0)
August 4, 2005
Things are unfolding again. Infinite Play The Movie, Documentary, Series and A Participatory Adventure
Well it appears things are unfolding again with this Infinite Play
a The Movie, Documentary, Series and A Participatory Adventure.
This should be something new and different compared to your average reality show. Infinite Play/
The idea of
becoming a Key holder
is interesting as is the part about the 144,000 limitation on the Keys.
I am really looking forward to this Easter Egg Hunt thing.
As for the long intriguing index, I was a little frustrated they were not all working yet.But I am sure it will worth the wait.
Posted by Richard at 2:43 AM | Comments (0)