« The War on Terror - A SHAM - stomping on shadows | Main | The point of awareness »
August 18, 2005
The Optimum Approach To War Fear and Terror
The Optimum Approach
I think the best approach is to eliminate the fear in the mind of your enemy because it is that fear that creates them as your enemy. On the same hand it is the fear in our mind leads us to see them as an enemy. Therefore we must eliminate the fear in our minds.
We must dispel all fear, any ideas on how to do that? What things counter fear? Compassion, love, Intelligence, awareness and most of all open communication, and last of all seeing all others as your self or as part of the same body.
I would suggest taking the very toughest route if everyone has the guts for it, which eliminates the cause.
Eliminate the labels that divide and separate from our communications.
Eliminate the fear in your mind and in the minds of your enemy with open communication.
Organize the people and implement the means to take collective control of the governments which eliminates individuals as weak links. Create full transparency with citizen oversight committees.
Embrace and transform = Paradise
Reject and Exclude = Doom
As for the unscrupulous and irrational men that are beyond reason, sequester them in contemplation centers till they evolve as a result of corrective enlightenment.
Eliminate the fictions in the minds of the people, but first you must eliminate them in your own mind.
We don’t need cameras on every street corner we need them in the boardrooms and government meeting places. This is where the crimes are committed that spawn the conditions that create all the other petty crime. The criminal in the street is in general just a symptom of imbalance.
A friend of mine who speaks with someone that has worked with Donald Rumsfeld and is an defense intelligence industry analyst, stated that Rumsfield is the impetus behind the whole thing not necessarily Bush. He is not liked by many, however he knows what he wants to achieve in his mind and sticks to it. He does what he thinks is right. We cannot find fault in that.
It is said that Rumsfeld's choice of thinking is to annihilate any future threat before it becomes one, it is that simple and straightforward. So if Iran or Syria could become a threat then one could say based on his policy and track record they will be taken over.
Now are they a real threat or does the fear and threat just exists in the minds of some men? Who knows? Is it all just a big game some? For sure it is a nightmare for many.
Then the big question can you justify force to eliminate a future threat? A future threat does not actually exist, only the present exists. If not what does it justify?
Had we done this early with Germany in WWII how would this have changed history, how many lives would it have saved?
It would seem the real crime of going into Iraq would be that there was no real threat. It was made up, in the minds of some men. It appears that evidence supports the idea that there was no real threat unless there was something they didn't tell us, which is why there should be no secrets. Did we go to war simply on speculation? Did we do it to stop Saddam from selling Oil in Euro's instead of dollars? Is this acceptable I think not. Then what does it justify?
Was there another approach to eliminating this possible future threat?
Yes and that is why we need to support the DOP legislation being voted on in September. We need a secretary of Peace.
Gravity is better than force to be used as the impetus for change. Better that they gravitate to the solution rather than being pushed.
I think the best approach is to eliminate the fear in the mind of one's enemy because it is that fear that creates them as your enemy. On the same hand it is the fear in our mind leads us to see them as enemy.
We must dispel all fear, any ideas on how to do that? What things counter fear?
What operation or policy can succeed if it is allowed to co-exist with greed and corruption.
The high probability is that the truth will come out. But what if it is not about truth, what if it is about the control and manipulation of perception?
What if the real battle is the control of public perception?
This can only be won or corrected by the creation of an independent media.
We now have the infrastructure to create an independent media and make it manifest.
That should be one of our top goals. Each individual can support the operation by subscribing to it.
But this is the past and we should not dwell on it but take the wisdom that it provided and apply it to the present which is where the future will manifest. Dwelling on the past and worrying about the future steals from the present. So lets not spend to much time arguing whether it was right or wrong but move to an approach that eliminates conflict and remove from their positions by proper channels any that cannot support this idea in their consciousness. Or perhaps a Secretary of Peace to balance the perspectives of these good men whose judgment could be clouded by their past.
Let the mothers no longer weep and let the children still have their fathers when they go to sleep.
Amen
Posted by Richard at August 18, 2005 2:01 PM
Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)