« Executable Solutions to The Worlds Problems | Main | The Christian Church is a political entity that was created »
March 31, 2007
The Secret Hijacked by the Forces of Ego?
The Secret as we see on Larry King and Oprah contains many great principles, wisdoms and insight yet in some ways it is lacking in one area. The idea that we are all one body and that as any part suffers so does the whole of the body. It tends to promote the illusion of separation and the focus on material things. I have no doubt that the intentions of the universe is for all to live in abundance and prosperity. Yet the very nature of our current system of things will not allow this, so it must change for this to become a truth. Many of the worlds industries and institution exist because of fictions thought to be truth but really erroneous belief. It would seem that discussion in this area is discouraged by the founders of the commercialized version of “the secret”.
I have followed the secret on the secret forums and participated in dialog regarding it since it’s inception which started with a single intriguing video clip and an idea. From there it developed and many people and the founders discussed it. In fact twice they announced a date that the secret would be released and that came and went, some of us saw through it. For sure it was their intention but as I explained to Paul Harrington one of the producers, to coordinate that global release would be next to impossible on the established television networks and expensive. I suggested they do their distribution over the Internet using streaming video and selling DVDs and let the popularity grow where the networks would then be knocking at their door. For now for the first time in history there is not a monopoly on media distribution channels and content is king, not the control of the channels because with the Internet they have become infinite. Paul thought this was good advice and as we can see, it was in deed but did I get any credit?
The Secret speaks how it was hidden from the masses by religious and corporate interests but one may wonder now if it has not been hijacked by the corporate and political interests to promote inaction in the world and to contribute to the silence which makes one an accessory to the crime.
The secret as portrayed would have us ignore the war, poverty, and corruption as if it will magically go away, which is good for those that benefit from war, conflict and the disproportionate distribution of wealth leading to poverty.
While I think that the producers Rhonda Byrne and Paul Harrington have good intentions and in no way would do anything to the detriment of the world or anybody, other interests may be at play now with the success of the secret. The same dark interests they say suppressed it.
For a long time the postings on the secret forums and where it was born were diversified and I never had one deleted. Now these same messages are deleted without notice. The messages deleted are mostly the ones that refer to the collective effects of the secret on the world. These messages contain no attacks, bad language no advertising or links to something to be sold. They simply contain information. One could assume then they are deleted because others do not want that information known.
For example there was a posting on the Hexagons on the North Pole of Saturn wondering if it was a collective effect of the distribution of the secret, and it was deleted.
When the censorship was challenged, with the very principles of The Secret in a very lucid manner, that deletion and censorship are a form of resistance and an attempt to control outcome, the message was deleted. One major concept in the secret is that when you resist something you only attract more. At first they tried to argue that the forum was like a house and that if someone smoked in their house they would kick them out. To liken the posting of text which no one is forced to read and therefore experience to smoking is simply a poor argument for their censorship of thought that they did not agree with.
All that being said one of the areas regarding the collective effect of the release of the secret would be the end of disease, because we would no longer attract it. There is an empire built upon treating the symptoms of disease which means all those depending on this empire would need to find new sources of revenue, this includes many doctors and nurses, pharmaceutical company employees etc. If they did not find a source of revenue they would default on their debt which would affect banks.
The principles in the secret are good but not complete. A vision board and imagination will not create wealth. One must put forth effort to create the cause behind the effect called wealth. I have no doubt the universe will help, and all the right people will come your way and the details will present themselves and the path will unfold as you go along.
As for ignoring war and poverty, I agree that we should not got to war against anything, but better we should acknowledge reality, embrace and transform and simply speak the truths needed to destroys the fictions that give rise to war, poverty, and corruption. For sure it is not something to dwell on but war and poverty should be tended to.
Of course the powers that be would have one practice the principles of the secret as presented and deny the issues of the world that need to be addressed. I would not lose any sleep if people were to create logins and plague the censors with truths and knowledge, since they would be attracting it. Who knows maybe they will come to a realization and it will become the place it once was, one of free speech, not limited speech that matches what the censors want.
That all aside there is a new production in process which picks up where the secret left off and or was lacking. Intelligence Cubed and Infinite Play the Movie. The I3 project will have uncensored forums to discuss the collective effects on the world. It will also contain new knowledge and insight on the workings of the universe never before published even in the ancient texts of old. The secret was basically a modern presentation of content that is very old, valuable, but not complete.
Posted by Richard at March 31, 2007 2:51 PM