Richard Thomas Infinite Player

« The Book of Love; concise edition; for today’s short attention spans. | Main | Cancer the death of aging, killed by immortality Part II »

February 16, 2008

Cancer the death of aging, killed or saved by immortality Part I

People accumulate free radical damage at varying rates often a question of where their attention is at, the environment lived in and the number of electron loaded molecules consumed (anti-oxidants). Can you imagine if one stopped free radical damage including that of the mitochondrial DNA, we may only age chronologically then?

When there is damage to cells there is division to repair and things are produced to fix it as well as waste in the fixing process, some of which can accumulate if the resources are not provided to remove it.

I have a theory that cell division of many types slow down as the amount of free radical damage is reduced. Which results in less telomere loss over a period of time, when the telomeres run out there is death. However there is a nano machine in the body that can add telomeres back this is why cancer cells are considered immortal. I have always referred to cancer as being killed by immortality. There does seem to be this other genetic switch that is triggered when the body reaches a certain percentage of free radical damage, producing a death for the body hormone, because the machine should not be used to replicate other machines at this point.

I have always wondered if cancer is some sort of impaired immune response, and attempt at repair, maybe an attempt by the body to produce stem cells, which I would really like to call Smart Cells. There are these certain tumors that produce tumor suppression factors preventing other tumors from growing. You know what the doctors do? They cut these tumors out and then the other ones grow like crazy killing the person. Doesn’t make sense maybe they should leave that one in. Or develop some tumor suppressor compound. I think they already exist in nature though. The last thing one might do is try to flood the body with carcinogens to kill the cancer? Isn’t that increasing the odds of creating a bunch of cancer. Most Chemo agents are cancer causing that is how they kill cancer cells. Chemotherapy and radiation are both cancer causing as is an oxygen deprived environment created by killing red blood cells with the cancer, and with the wrong body PH are we creating more cancer with the treatment?

There was no proof available the last time I asked, that treatments Chemo and radiation the extends life of those that take it and may shorten it. If it does at what cost to quality? They are profitable.

There is some proof in animals that they last a long time with cancer, I guess it depends on the type though.

If I had cancer, most people do but never know it, because those few cells are destroyed by the immune system. I would take 20 – 30 grams of Vitamin C a day to enable the body to do things it can’t normally do. Linus Pauling’s research shows when given large doses of vitamin C the body begins to produce an extra volume of very good things like certain enzymes, some that prevent free radical damage.

CANCER (ADJUVANT) TREATMENTS Comprehensive Collection of Material

Posted by Richard at February 16, 2008 5:06 PM